Exploring Factors Behind the Delay in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Firms [Quality Management]

The purpose of this thesis is to comprehensively explore the adoption of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) practices and the factors that influence the timing of such adoption in firms. This research employs a rigorous approach involving a thorough literature review and empirical case studies. The study's findings emphasise the critical significance of key factors influencing firms' decisions regarding SSCM practices. Significantly, this research highlights the paramount role of awareness and knowledge enhancement within firms. A lack of information and understanding acts as a substantial barrier to SSCM adoption, emphasising the need for educational and training programs to equip employees with the essential skills and knowledge for sustainable practices. Collaborative efforts with supply chain partners and suppliers emerge as a valuable strategy for promoting sustainability and innovation within the supply chain. The study also underscores the importance of rigorous financial considerations, including costbenefit analyses, in informed decision-making and resource allocation. Addressing the risks and disruptions associated with unsustainable practices is deemed crucial for building resilient and sustainable supply chains. This research's originality lies in its comprehensive approach to understanding SSCM adoption by integrating empirical evidence from diverse case studies. It offers industry-specific insights into challenges and opportunities, rooted in real-world contexts, revealing the intricate dynamics that influence the timing, that influence firms' adoption decisions. The study places particular emphasis on the timing of adopting sustainable practices, highlighting how delays and early actions shape outcomes and strategies. By focusing on the role of education and training programs as critical tools for overcoming adoption barriers, the research contributes a unique dimension to the field. Furthermore, this study advances theoretical discourse while providing actionable insights aligned with industry demands. While these findings constitute a significant contribution to existing knowledge, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations. These encompass issues related to generalisability, the exploration of alternative strategies, the need to distinguish between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and larger corporations, and the potential for more in-depth examinations of stakeholder dynamics. Nonetheless, this research lays a robust foundation for insights into the complexities of sustainable practice adoption and offers valuable directions for future research and practical applications.